Emergent weirdness in AI

Daniel Kahneman on ‘Emergent Weirdness’ in Artifical Intelligences
Nov 28 2011
http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2011/11/daniel-kahneman-on-emergent-weirdness-in-artifical-intelligences/249125

Emergent weirdness is a good bet.
Only deduction is certain.
Whenever an inductive short-cut is applied, you can search for cases in which it will fail.
It is always useful to ask “What relevant factors are not considered?” and “What irrelevant factors affect the conclusions?”
By their very nature, heuristic shortcuts will produce biases, and that is true for both humans and artificial intelligence, but the heuristics of AI are not necessarily the human ones.

heuristics

related:

December 7, 2011
https://franzcalvo.wordpress.com/2015/03/09/twitters-trending-algorithm

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/10/upshot/when-algorithms-discriminate.html

bvt123

Advertisements

One thought on “Emergent weirdness in AI

  1. Pingback: Twitter’s Trending Algorithm | franzcalvo

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s