Focus on Memory: Memory and law: what can cognitive neuroscience contribute?

Focus on Memory:
Memory and law: what can cognitive neuroscience contribute?
Nature Neuroscience 16,119–123(2013) http://www.nature.com/neuro/journal/v16/n2/full/nn.3294.html
Daniel L Schacter & Elizabeth F Loftus

A recent decision in the United States by the New Jersey Supreme Court has led to improved jury instructions that incorporate psychological research showing that memory does not operate like a video recording. Here we consider how cognitive neuroscience could contribute to addressing memory in the courtroom. We discuss conditions in which neuroimaging can distinguish true and false memories in the laboratory and note reasons to be skeptical about its use in courtroom cases. We also discuss neuroscience research concerning false and imagined memories, misinformation effects and reconsolidation phenomena that may enhance understanding of why memory does not operate like a video recording.

related:
https://franzcalvo.wordpress.com/2014/06/01/you-your-brain-julian-keenan

One thought on “Focus on Memory: Memory and law: what can cognitive neuroscience contribute?

  1. Pingback: Molding reality so that it’s palatable | franzcalvo

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s